Asrock Z790 Pro RS/D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 138%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z790 Pro RS/D4  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 237
2-Core 480
140% 271 Pts
4-Core 959
8-Core 1,706
160% 1,332 Pts
64-Core 2846
176% 2846 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 138%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 346 244 221 196 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 370
Mixed 330
SusWrite 276
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 43.5
150% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 134%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
68GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 432 330 175 355 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 371
Write 138
Mixed 310
SusWrite 313
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 31.7
114% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 224
194% 284 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 96%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
137GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 361 346 351 356 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 422
Mixed 366
SusWrite 367
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 45.3
158% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 345
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.2
Write 93
Mixed 50.6
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 62%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 80 80 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 41.5
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 78.6
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 44%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80
Write 72.9
Mixed 51.6
51% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 52%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
354GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 111 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 110
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 83%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 100
Write 90.5
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 82.8
114% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4400C19-8GTZKK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 51.9
156% 54.7 GB/s
SC Read 34.5
SC Write 54.6
SC Mixed 40.8
124% 43.3 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z790 Pro RS/D4 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 308%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 Pro RS/D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback