Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 171 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 594 57% 468 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 19.6 17% 19.3 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.4 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R024N SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 158 166 134 181 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 351 Write 112 Mixed 338 SusWrite 166 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 31.9 114% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 144 106% 137 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 93%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB 3,948 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.9 7.3 6.8 6.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 105 Write 7.7 SusWrite 6.6 31% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 79% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JDYS1G72PZ- 2x8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 660 samples	208x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	181x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	46x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87