Lenovo 3209L6M

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Lenovo 3209L6M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130321
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '23 at 10:22
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 184 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 449 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 010A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 5.1 2% 3.5 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.1 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 219 197 206 200 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 435 Write 358 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 219 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 0.7 16% 9.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 31.6 42% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 60%
Netac 320GB 320GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 155GB free Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 223 81 15 91 16 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.6% Average	Read 259 Write 230 Mixed 222 SusWrite 91.3 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 18 88% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 98.3 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 1 15% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 86%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 932GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 58 Write 19.8 Mixed 22 SusWrite 24.8 36% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 36% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 029E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3209L6M Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 3209L6M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
9905471-011.A00LF Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 99U5474-037.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16