Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '17 at 21:35
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 138
62% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 218
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842A) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 23.5
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 15.2
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.8% Average
Read 240
Write 219
Mixed 200
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 14.9
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 17.7
22% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
728GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 125
Write 100
Mixed 29.8
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.14
52% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
249GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 76
Write 78.3
Mixed 66.8
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
54GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 107
Mixed 110
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.14
38% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991769 (996769)000 991769 (996769)000 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 16
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback