Today's hottest deals

Avell C65 MUV / G1750 MUV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAvell C65 MUV / G1750 MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell C65 MUV / G1750 MUV
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '23 at 23:14
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 35.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
63% 123 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 593
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1065) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 91
Parallax 6.7
5% 34.5 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28512GPTCB3B-S114613 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 62 36 26 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 386
Write 236
Mixed 310
SusWrite 61.5
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 5.9
55% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 0.1
45% 110 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C65 MUV / G1750 MUV Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Avell C65 MUV / G1750 MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback