Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 17:09
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 318
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 838
87% 699 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$267
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB; tough
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 113
Parallax 120
105% 121 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 85.2
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM760 1TB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0624D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 227 406 603 597 520 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,819
Write 2,387
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 470
359% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 40.2
236% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,139
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 1,066
780% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 215%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-40B190X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 37.5
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38.8
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M/ac Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock A520M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback