HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 472
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS4802G0A-00JH30 480GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 272 280 279 284 291 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Read 276
Write 274
Mixed 253
SusWrite 279
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 20.1
96% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 38.2
82% 165 MB/s
USB3.0 high speed 960GB
707GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 52.9
Write 11
Mixed 9
SusWrite 32.7
30% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback