| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 750-175se (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 2B4B |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161206 |
| Uptime | 7.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 28 '23 at 15:54 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.1%
Very good
|
72% 125 Pts
|
55% 449 Pts
|
34% 542 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.30
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
31% 32.9 fps
|
28% 34.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 2TB-$158
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 352 376 395 402 399 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
85% 377 MB/s
|
106% 36.1 MB/s
|
197% 269 MB/s
|
|
USB 3.0 MassStorage 2TB
1TB free, PID 5002
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 160 161 161 161 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
177% 135 MB/s
|
96% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.8%
Very good
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
59% 20.6 GB/s
|
52% 76.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 750-175se Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 750-175se
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 33x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 10x |
| GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $520 |