Asrock B650M PG Riptide

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsrock B650M PG Riptide  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M PG Riptide
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 16:18
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 189
2-Core 372
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 708
8-Core 1,074
110% 891 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 164E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.00.11
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 13.7
6% 11.9 fps
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 21.9
14% 14.9 fps
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
K7000-512GB 512GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.F.F.R2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2570 2607 2594 2345 816 660 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 2,642
Mixed 2,296
SusWrite 1932
536% 2,381 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 107
383% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,498
DQ Write 1388
DQ Mixed 1,509
1,114% 1,465 MB/s
Poor: 406%
This bench: 406%
Great: 465%
CG-1TB 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: SN13109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 452 451 454 452 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 487
Mixed 416
SusWrite 457
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 38.9
155% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 260
191% 246 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 53.7
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 50.5
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 53.1
153% 53.5 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 154%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B650M PG Riptide Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M PG Riptide

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback