HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-n0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-n0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A42
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 10:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 270
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 917
85% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
HP(103C 8A42) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.24.05
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.2% Very good
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 121
Parallax 140
59% 111 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 132
103% 126 fps
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 92%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-512G-1006 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3024 2961 2441 1042 821 881 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 3,465
Write 3,332
Mixed 2,876
SusWrite 1,862
647% 2,884 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 75.2
261% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 1,175
879% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 384%
Great: 434%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 39
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 28.3
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-n0xxx Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-n0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback