Samsung 730QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemSamsung 730QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QED-KB1US
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 04:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 169
2-Core 247
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 657
66% 538 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C876) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 20.9
13% 31.4 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 17.6
17% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 987 964 218 235 162 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 831
Write 1,027
Mixed 906
SusWrite 460
182% 806 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 38.5
146% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 992
714% 914 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 145%
Great: 218%
ROG ESD-S1CL 1TB
283GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 326 287 393 393 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 268
Write 400
Mixed 202
SusWrite 342
69% 303 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 12.9
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 163
119% 154 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 52.4
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730QED Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 730QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback