Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 04:39
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 284
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 959
89% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Asus(1043 8715) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 705 488 474 503 493 491 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 712
Write 1,288
Mixed 1130
SusWrite 526
208% 914 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 53.1
200% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 1,003
DQ Mixed 996
746% 988 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 165%
Great: 291%
CSSD-MG4VT 1TB
298GB free
Firmware: SCFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 489 485 488 492 491 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 491
Mixed 482
SusWrite 487
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 57.7
195% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 376
283% 378 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,496
Write 1,687
Mixed 1,510
351% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 56.9
200% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1075
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,132
833% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 253%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
605GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 156 153 158 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
H/W DISK 2 8TB
4TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 2.1
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 39%
H/W DISK 1 8TB
1TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 33 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.1% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 37
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 33.5
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 61%
H/W DISK 3 8TB
2TB free, PID 0230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
Read 49.9
Write 33.1
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 2.1
35% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 25.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback