HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D2
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 15:01
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 22.6
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 68.8
27% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 104
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 87D2) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 140 113 133 147 131 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 205
Write 208
Mixed 194
SusWrite 150
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 17.7
48% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 319
225% 286 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 220%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 93 91 95 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 78.9
Write 79
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 93.3
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE V03D4S88GB1G81G82400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.4% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 302
13% 302 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-gr0xxx Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback