MSI MS-16V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GS66 Stealth 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16V3  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 199
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 701
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 107
Parallax 7.9
6% 40.6 fps
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.8
8% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
497GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2052 2160 2207 1970 1541 1192 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 2,306
Mixed 2,011
SusWrite 1,854
469% 2,078 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.1
195% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 793
596% 799 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 295%
Great: 531%
SABRENT 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 240 235 240 240 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 235
Write 223
Mixed 205
SusWrite 239
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 25.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
4% 8.83 MB/s
G-tech ArmorATD 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 100 101 98 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 91.5
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 100
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 70%
WD WD181KFGX-68AFPN0 18TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 232 231 230 231 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 206
Mixed 135
SusWrite 229
144% 196 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 2.3
607% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
WD WD181KFGX-68AFPN0 18TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 225 229 227 228 223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 214
Mixed 120
SusWrite 226
143% 195 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.3
592% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
WD WD181KFGX-68AFPN0 18TB
15TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 232 229 229 230 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 228
Mixed 148
SusWrite 228
155% 210 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.9
598% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
WD WD181KFGX-68AFPN0 18TB
14TB free
Firmware: 83.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 231 230 228 230 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 232
Mixed 149
SusWrite 228
156% 213 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 2.2
652% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
943GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 153
Write 171
Mixed 153
SusWrite 22.1
164% 125 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.9
227% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 74%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 113
SusWrite 22.1
122% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 74%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 143
Write 149
Mixed 129
SusWrite 22.1
145% 111 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
211% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 74%
WDC WD60 PURZ-85ZUFY1 6TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 156 154 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 155
184% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 64%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 98.9
Write 132
Mixed 111
SusWrite 22.1
123% 91 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 74%
ST10000N M0478-2H7100 10TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 155
SusWrite 22.1
134% 102 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 1.3
631% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.9
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 1
446% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 89%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 119
Mixed 114
SusWrite 22.1
119% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 74%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 121
Write 132
Mixed 107
SusWrite 22.1
125% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
213% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 26.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16V3 Builds (Compare 648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback