Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '17 at 02:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 120
58% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 257
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.24 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 119
Write 98.7
Mixed 119
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 107%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
98GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 40.9
Write 44.8
Mixed 39
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.28
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback