Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$85 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 294 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 19.5 Parallax 18.9 13% 18.3 fps	MRender 21.2 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 15.5 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 225 233 239 241 243 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 467 Write 247 Mixed 171 SusWrite 231 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 23.5 106% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 58.1 105% 212 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 85%
ASMT 2235 180GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 141GB free, PID 225c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 25 26 26 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22% Poor	Read 53 Write 25.6 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 25.4 40% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 7.6 371% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 2x2GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	83x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	12x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $113