Acer Predator PT516-52s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive501% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PT516-52s  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Volante_ADH
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 05:59
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 63.4
1-Core 176
2-Core 343
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,149
112% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,951
121% 1,951 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1610) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 192
Parallax 14.5
10% 72.7 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.1
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 21%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Acer(1025 1610) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3410 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.44
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 217
Parallax 131
106% 160 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 142
Splatting 132
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 151%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA2T0TFH 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3770 3967 4040 3496 3313 1614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
501% Outstanding
Read 3,907
Write 4,042
Mixed 1,938
SusWrite 3,367
744% 3,314 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 83.4
299% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1077
805% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 501%
Great: 559%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.8
Write 2
Mixed 6
12% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 41.8
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 114%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT516-52s Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer Predator PT516-52s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback