Today's hottest deals

Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ67CG  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ67CG
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20111103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 289
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 17
15% 17.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 15.4
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 161 178 195 202 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 307
Write 193
Mixed 171
SusWrite 187
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 16.6
63% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 155
90% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
298GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 115 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 112
Write 98.1
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 114
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CENTRIUM 10/2013 SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ67CG Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ67CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback