Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 822 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '23 at 12:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 199
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 382
49% 372 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.1
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.1
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DSS128-S535D 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW191225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 44 22 23 38 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 360
Write 337
Mixed 172
SusWrite 37.6
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 9.7
54% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 18.3
42% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
158GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 114 114 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 115
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-4GNT 04CB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.4% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback