Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 275%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 497%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics318% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory489.7 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,137
101% 854 Pts
64-Core 5,849
362% 5,849 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
318% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 579
Parallax 768
369% 600 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 588
Splatting 308
376% 480 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 318%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 435 428 297 290 285 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 442
Mixed 426
SusWrite 343
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 41.6
132% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 218
168% 231 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 126%
Crucial_CT2050MX 2TB
398GB free
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 435 428 285 280 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 261
Write 274
Mixed 159
SusWrite 337
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 23.2
77% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 151
116% 156 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CVF 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
236% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 69.7
MC Mixed 119
278% 97.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 236%
Great: 254%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback