Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B550M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 887
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,084
67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
MSI(1462 3177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 77.3
Reflection 87
Parallax 77
63% 80.4 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 75
Splatting 67.5
59% 73 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 441 449 453 456 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 446
Mixed 422
SusWrite 444
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 25.9
144% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 35
85% 171 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4BL.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 38.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback