Today's hottest deals

MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 43
1-Core 115
2-Core 186
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 536
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7C89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3.8
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 240 19 232 76 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 385
Write 312
Mixed 369
SusWrite 160
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 13.5
78% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 24.5
67% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 1,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback