bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 17 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 174
50% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 307
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 78 80 82 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 67%
Virtual HD 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 305 316 313 312 311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 64GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 13 14 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 16.3
Write 19
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 19.7
14% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 20 22 21 46 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 56.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 30.5
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 1 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback