Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8D
Memory47.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 684
60% 510 Pts
64-Core 3665
227% 3665 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 63.5
29% 52.2 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 41.4
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 739 660 390 188 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 916
Write 884
Mixed 763
SusWrite 478
171% 760 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 15.2
63% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
31% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback