Intel NUC11PABi5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi5  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '23 at 21:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 216
69% 129 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 556
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 21.6
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 15
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 790 670 471 432 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 719
Mixed 656
SusWrite 575
177% 796 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 37.7
131% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 443
294% 353 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 139%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11PABi5 Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback