Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 88.2 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 119 60% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 186 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7800M 500 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Dell(1028 053F) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 17.1 10% 14.4 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 13.2 Splatting 10 9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 256GB 530 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11035 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 356 Write 338 Mixed 374 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 33.7 110% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 255 188% 244 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 433GB free Firmware: GH2OA560 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 113 Write 125 Mixed 24.7 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
USB DISK 3.0 4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 22.4 Write 2.2 Mixed 3.5 8% 9.37 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 6%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 143GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 59.8 Write 53.8 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 64.4 67% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64C88B1NS-DI 2x4GB 762 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	127x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	82x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	72x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	18x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	11x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	10x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	18x
NT8GC64B8HB0NS-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 52%, 612 samples	15x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 52%, 422 samples	10x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16