Foxconn H55MXV Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn H55MXV Series  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100611
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 21:16
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 392
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.94 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 40GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 36%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
292GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 99
Write 90.2
Mixed 93.3
71% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.32
115% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 74%
HP USB Flash Drive-m100 2GB
2GB free, PID ba63
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.15% Terrible
Read 15.1
Write 4.03
Mixed 1.13
6% 6.76 MB/s
4K Read 4.39
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55MXV Series Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H55MXV Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback