Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '17 at 19:13
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 115
53% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 365
35% 287 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 74
Parallax 61.1
59% 69.3 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 70.2
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 367
Write 56.7
Mixed 287
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 6.02
66% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 9.45
34% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
892GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 90.5
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.38
81% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 9905403-444.A00LF 9905403-431.A00LF 9905403-444.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback