Today's hottest deals

HP 280 G1 ST Business PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 280 G1 ST Business PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5B
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 05:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 168
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 234
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Device(1545 5450) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 46 46 39 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 50.8
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1315 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G1 ST Business PC Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 ST Business PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback