Today's hottest deals

Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 17:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G6900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 187
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 208
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$245
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 117
Parallax 125
110% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 106
Splatting 85.6
88% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inland NVMe SSD 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 724 365 348 157 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 822
Mixed 542
SusWrite 332
149% 667 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 7.8
83% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 261
177% 224 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2666C19-8GVR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback