Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.96% Terrible	Memory 13.5 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 24.4 10% 17.5 Pts	4-Core 13.6 8-Core 25.3 2% 19.5 Pts	64-Core 28.6 2% 28.6 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.96% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B46) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.3 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 7.8 5.7 7.4 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 33 Write 56.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 14.9 25% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F CT51264BF160B.M16F 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 372 11% 372 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	8x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	8x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	1x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16