Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17F3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10SCSXR
MotherboardMSI MS-17F3  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 20:35
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 212
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 484
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSI(1462 12A7) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3129
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 89
Parallax 55.2
48% 67.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 49.7
45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 857
Write 838
Mixed 794
185% 830 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 48.1
173% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 265
228% 331 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 203%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 26 28 24 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 160
Write 35.6
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 27.6
44% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 13.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F3 Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback