Lenovo 20FMS7800T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20FMS7800T  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FMS7800T
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 05:51
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Memory 13.4
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 71.8
17% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 62.4
7% 55.3 Pts
64-Core 48.4
3% 48.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 5.1
3% 3.23 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.2
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 77 97 106 117 104 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.4% Very poor
Read 92.7
Write 118
Mixed 145
SusWrite 102
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 4.9
18% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 92%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB
441GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 25 26 27 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 21.8
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 24.9
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 37%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
85GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.7 7.6 6 6.4 8.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 5
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 6.5
10% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 44%
Intenso Twist Line 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9.7 10 10 7 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 10.4
Write 7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 8.6
10% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 47%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
50GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,867
Mixed 8.8
621% 938 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.8% Terrible
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 373
11% 373 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FMS7800T Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FMS7800T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback