Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1230U 284 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 30 1-Core 39.5 2-Core 60.4 26% 43.3 Pts	4-Core 89.7 8-Core 115 13% 102 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 989 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Dell(1028 0B14) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 6.8 6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme ESE2A044-512 Phison 512GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19010008 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 95 60 92 53 84 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18% Very poor	Read 133 Write 108 Mixed 216 SusWrite 81.1 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 7.7 25% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 207%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
H9JKNNNFB3AECR-N6H 8x2GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.1 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 255 16% 255 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 130%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-1250U12thBench 47%, 824 samples	305x
Gen Intel Core i5-1230U12thBench 48%, 284 samples	108x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 989 samples	409x
RTX 3070Nvidia $495Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1x

SSD
ESE2A044-512 Phison 512GBNvmeBench 105%, 94 samples	119x
3460 Micron 512GBNvmeBench 118%, 114 samples	112x
3460 Micron 1024GBNvmeBench 118%, 61 samples	63x

RAM
8x2GBH9JKNNNFB3AECR-N6HBench 102%, 226 samples	169x
8x4GBK3LK6K6@BM-BGCPBench 103%, 104 samples	95x
8x2GBMT62F1G64D8CH-031Bench 108%, 79 samples	61x