Today's hottest deals

LG 17Z90Q-E.AD75B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90Q-E.AD75B  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90Q
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 22:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 325
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 899
92% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,223
76% 1,223 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1854 0450) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 27.2
15% 25.3 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 21.7
20% 24.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 1270 963 1489 1036 878 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 1,846
Mixed 1,947
SusWrite 1,099
342% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 54.4
195% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 545
369% 456 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 191%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC@BM-MGCP 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 55.5
MC Mixed 56
162% 56.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 143%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z90Q-E.AD75B Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: LG 17Z90Q-E.AD75B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback