Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration400 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 130
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 320
36% 281 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 67.4
52% 66.6 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 27.3
24% 29 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP100S2128G 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJRA0202 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 191
Write 158
Mixed 139
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 9.82
61% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 11.3
16% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 49%
Maxtor STM3320620A 320GB
38GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 55.1
Write 40.5
Mixed 38.7
34% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 43%
Maxtor STM3320613AS 320GB
23GB free
Firmware: MC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 79.3
Write 103
Mixed 67.5
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.47
93% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 66%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
81GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 53.5
Write 48.9
Mixed 52
66% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.25
4K Mixed 0.08
12% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 33%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000, Trascend JetFlash 700 16GB USB 3.0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 82.9
Write 5.03
Mixed 5.94
24% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.59
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.57
63% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback