Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 116% UFO	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221115
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$549 3,143 User benchmarks, average bench 114% AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 211 2-Core 418 123% 238 Pts	4-Core 821 8-Core 1,616 144% 1,219 Pts	64-Core 3,740 232% 3,740 Pts
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 124%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$720 22,998 User benchmarks, average bench 290% Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.18 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 20 Parallax 20 16% 20 fps	MRender 20 Gravity 20 Splatting 20 16% 20 fps
Poor: 263% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 305%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 918 884 827 764 703 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,234 Write 1,721 Mixed 955 SusWrite 895 323% 1,451 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 225 4K Mixed 74.5 297% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,588 DQ Write 1,369 DQ Mixed 1161 957% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 302%
Jmicron Tech 512GB 406 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 211GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 398 398 399 399 399 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 380 Write 397 Mixed 360 SusWrite 398 87% 384 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 38.3 124% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 248 182% 239 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 210GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 491 491 492 492 492 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 496 Mixed 385 SusWrite 492 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 64 214% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 82.7 Write 95.3 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 80.1 113% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 65%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 387GB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 63 63 62 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 71.5 Write 72 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 63.2 90% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 204% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB 742 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	178% Outstanding	MC Read 65.1 MC Write 66.1 MC Mixed 65.2 187% 65.5 GB/s	SC Read 48.8 SC Write 66.4 SC Mixed 53.6 161% 56.3 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 297%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 417%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $369Bench 117%, 4,023 samples	123x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $279Bench 112%, 4,548 samples	55x
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD $549Bench 114%, 3,143 samples	52x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	61x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	47x
RTX 4080Nvidia $720Bench 290%, 22,998 samples	33x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $167Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	45x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $190Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	24x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	20x

RAM
F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 190%, 9,902 samples	22x
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples	20x
F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GBUnknownBench 176%, 6,345 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $2,336

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16