Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$480
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 211
2-Core 418
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,616
144% 1,219 Pts
64-Core 3,740
232% 3,740 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.18
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 20
Parallax 20
16% 20 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 20
Splatting 20
16% 20 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 918 884 827 764 703 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 1,721
Mixed 955
SusWrite 895
323% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 74.5
297% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 1,369
DQ Mixed 1,161
957% 1,373 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 300%
Great: 302%
Jmicron Tech 512GB
211GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 398 398 399 399 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 380
Write 397
Mixed 360
SusWrite 398
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 38.3
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 248
182% 239 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
210GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 491 491 492 492 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 496
Mixed 385
SusWrite 492
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64
214% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 82.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 80.1
113% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
387GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 63 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.5
Write 72
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 63.2
90% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
204% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
178% Outstanding
MC Read 65.1
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 65.2
187% 65.5 GB/s
SC Read 48.8
SC Write 66.4
SC Mixed 53.6
161% 56.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 178%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $2,432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback