Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KD  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 12:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 118
2-Core 182
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 386
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 50E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 3.5
4% 7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.4
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1545 788 725 564 656 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1491
Write 2145
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 821
333% 1,476 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 50.7
182% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 627
424% 525 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 187%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 30.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 15.6
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G5 KD Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback