Asus P8H61-M LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 01:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 389
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8411) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 158
Write 140
Mixed 144
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.28
87% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 112%
USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
25GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 22.3
Mixed 22.9
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.11
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 1.82
158% 3.36 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DBLT4GN568O 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback