Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30E0CTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30E0CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX 12-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 333
98% 189 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,256
114% 960 Pts
64-Core 2,186
135% 2,186 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Legend(17AA 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 201
Parallax 181
152% 190 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 141
Splatting 143
128% 159 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,919
Write 3,165
Mixed 2,852
667% 2,979 MB/s
4K Read 71.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 93.6
306% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 985
743% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 419%
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: CL2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,912
Write 3,224
Mixed 2,937
678% 3,024 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 95.4
312% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 939
DQ Mixed 1,066
804% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 419%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 171
Mixed 90.2
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.9
864% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2R1 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 41.2
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 33.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30E0CTO1WW Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30E0CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback