Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 563
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 637
39% 637 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 730 644 632 580 566 568 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,900
Write 872
Mixed 651
SusWrite 620
223% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 53.2
201% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1059
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 373
356% 580 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 206%
Great: 243%
JMicron Generic DISK03 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 40
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 0.3
38% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
149% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 77%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB
221GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 5 4.8 4.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 4.8
36% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
863GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 36 37 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 51.3
Write 37.9
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 35.5
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK01 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 40.7
Mixed 33
SusWrite 0.3
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback