HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory183.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 19:48
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 822
73% 618 Pts
64-Core 4,097
254% 4,097 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
MSI(1462 C72B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 153
Parallax 154
127% 154 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 134
Splatting 117
117% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1958 1976 2104 1904 1895 1796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,872
SusWrite 1939
430% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60.8
210% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 703
524% 700 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 291%
Great: 477%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1691 1694 1695 1691 1701 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,887
Write 1,578
Mixed 820
SusWrite 1,697
335% 1,495 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.4
162% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 814
615% 829 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 266%
Great: 331%
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
2TB free
Firmware: ELFKAN.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4505 4526 4594 4591 4590 4582 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 2,183
Write 4,650
Mixed 2,546
SusWrite 4,565
795% 3,486 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 50.3
184% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 732
545% 729 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 455%
Great: 323%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
928GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 68 67 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
Read 161
Write 74.4
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 69.1
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 12x16GB
12 of 12 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
173% Outstanding
MC Read 80.3
MC Write 72.1
MC Mixed 67.3
209% 73.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 173%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback