HP 255 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 255 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 890E
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 51.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 184
62% 114 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 690
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 890E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 26.6
9% 18.5 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 14.5
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-8D128-HP 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 147 152 155 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 381
Write 166
Mixed 203
SusWrite 150
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 22.8
70% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 132
112% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 126 127 126 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 105
Write 124
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 126
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE CT8G4SFS824A.C8FJ 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback