LG 23V540-GT50K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 23V540-GT50K  (all builds)
MotherboardLG White Tip Mountain
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140910
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 08:40
Run Duration817 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 150
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 227
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 0194) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 6
3% 5.26 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.48
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3107000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 484
Write 20.9
Mixed 354
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 0.04
41% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 6.14
37% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 66%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
739GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 70.9
Write 70.7
Mixed 68.4
53% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 62%
Apricorn SATAWire 80GB
47GB free, PID 0040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 30.5
Mixed 13.4
30% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.25
48% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 75%
SELLGINO Memory 2.0 FS 0GB
0GB free, PID 2202
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.82
Write 0.81
1% 0.81 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23V540-GT50K Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG 23V540-GT50K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback