Acer Veriton M680G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M680G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M680G
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '17 at 23:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 142
52% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 201
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 3550) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 8.56
7% 8.09 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10.4
8% 9.81 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 140
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.24
94% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
823GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 137
Write 99.2
Mixed 93.8
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 90.9
Write 80.5
Mixed 79.7
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.27
67% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-020.A00LF 0198 99U5471-020.A00LF 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GB
1334, 1334, 1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M680G Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M680G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback