Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 125
2-Core 243
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 382
47% 360 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 112
92% 108 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 103
Splatting 93
94% 118 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 108%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 86GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 148 63 61 47 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 401
Write 309
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 90.3
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.8
34% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 1.3
44% 105 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 5120 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback