Today's hottest deals

Asrock P67 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 08:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 359
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0421) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 23.1
12% 18.7 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.8
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 55 81 56 75 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 304
Write 76.3
Mixed 115
SusWrite 71.7
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 6.3
70% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 53.4
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 55.6
45% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 85%
Innostor Innostor 16GB
10GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 206
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 21.8
60% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
55% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-009.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Pro3 Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback