Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-58  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Camellia_TL
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 03:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 96
48% 76 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 164
19% 150 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 10.8
6% 9.2 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 0.1
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 183 183 207 200 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 825
Write 710
Mixed 738
SusWrite 194
138% 617 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 32.4
121% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 217
195% 304 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2R1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-58 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback