Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 845E
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190502
Uptime	9.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '23 at 12:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 44.4 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 97.8 37% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 153 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 845E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 5.8 4% 16.2 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 10.1 6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 845E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 426.00 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 36.8 30% 37.4 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 25.8 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 262 277 258 237 245 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 410 Write 326 Mixed 230 SusWrite 264 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 19.1 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 216 179% 258 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 456GB free Firmware: AX1R4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 107 106 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 99 Write 102 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 106 62% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R748G2400S2S Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	1,943x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,406x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	808x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	262x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	146x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	394x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	317x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	265x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16