Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$280
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 64.4
1-Core 204
2-Core 409
114% 226 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,531
140% 1,174 Pts
64-Core 2,832
175% 2,832 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 543
Parallax 11.2
8% 188 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,766
Write 3,202
Mixed 3,001
671% 2,990 MB/s
4K Read 81.6
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 115
383% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,586
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1392
1,046% 1,404 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 16.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback